Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 780880">Problem is, Eset or any vendor for that matter can&#039;t explain to you why without analyzing the test samples and looking at everything all together, hence Marcos responses. Even [USER=56349]@Lockdown[/USER] gave an example for appguard, but that was only after they were able to assess the situation. If they aren&#039;t able to, they cannot provide an answer. In this case Leo didn&#039;t send anything to Eset, so they may not be able to ever fully explain it. Also if you read this thread carefully, you will see that people are essentially saying eset is crap because you have comments like&quot;i won&#039;t recommend eset&quot;, it won&#039;t protect you from attacksc, etc...., all of this because it failed one test and didn&#039;t get 100%The problem is that people do infact put emotion into these discussions. As I&#039;ve said, everytime there&#039;s a test, people play musical chairs with software. Also, you get opinions and misinformation regarding products and how they work and are constantly stated as fact, when they are not. Some people say they failed because it doesn&#039;t have a BB, but even if it did, would it really make&nbsp; difference? People assume that if a product has a certain feature some how it will make this even better, when infact it may not. Again use what you like and don&#039;t stress over these tests <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 780880"] Problem is, Eset or any vendor for that matter can't explain to you why without analyzing the test samples and looking at everything all together, hence Marcos responses. Even [USER=56349]@Lockdown[/USER] gave an example for appguard, but that was only after they were able to assess the situation. If they aren't able to, they cannot provide an answer. In this case Leo didn't send anything to Eset, so they may not be able to ever fully explain it. Also if you read this thread carefully, you will see that people are essentially saying eset is crap because you have comments like"i won't recommend eset", it won't protect you from attacksc, etc...., all of this because it failed one test and didn't get 100% The problem is that people do infact put emotion into these discussions. As I've said, everytime there's a test, people play musical chairs with software. Also, you get opinions and misinformation regarding products and how they work and are constantly stated as fact, when they are not. Some people say they failed because it doesn't have a BB, but even if it did, would it really make difference? People assume that if a product has a certain feature some how it will make this even better, when infact it may not. Again use what you like and don't stress over these tests :) [/QUOTE]

Verification