Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Game Of Thrones" data-source="post: 1110701" data-attributes="member: 23430">This player situation was an interesting situation. please keep posting your info and findings, in general, eset has really low amount of false positives but:It seems that since they put more power into their cloud detection, they have a few more false positives. One of them I saw was amaztools. Some of our users used a legitimate VPN tool, and the developer was trusted. I think it was called v2rayn. There was a detection of amaztools from the files of this VPN client, but after some days, it was resolved, and the detection was from the cloud: suspicious detections.recently, they changed their tactic of using the cloud(livegrid) and we see more cloud detections these days. something Kaspersky did some years ago with Ksn so bypassing it and testing malware on it would be harder because the app sends more telemetry to the cloud which you can not see how It works and bypass it</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Game Of Thrones, post: 1110701, member: 23430"] This player situation was an interesting situation. please keep posting your info and findings, in general, eset has really low amount of false positives but: It seems that since they put more power into their cloud detection, they have a few more false positives. One of them I saw was amaztools. Some of our users used a legitimate VPN tool, and the developer was trusted. I think it was called v2rayn. There was a detection of amaztools from the files of this VPN client, but after some days, it was resolved, and the detection was from the cloud: suspicious detections. recently, they changed their tactic of using the cloud(livegrid) and we see more cloud detections these days. something Kaspersky did some years ago with Ksn so bypassing it and testing malware on it would be harder because the app sends more telemetry to the cloud which you can not see how It works and bypass it [/QUOTE]

Verification