Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cofer123" data-source="post: 1111615" data-attributes="member: 92976">Leo&#039;s testing methodology is flawed when it comes to ESET. ESET has repeatedly and clearly stated (on their forums, on their documentation and by Marcos on some of Leo&#039;s videos) that it needs all modules enabled to work.It&#039;s been like this for many years and he refuses to learn either by ignorance or actual malice at this point. His <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3co-80OeHQE" target="_blank">recent comparison video </a>is a clear example of bad testing methodology, as he uses a heavily outdated version of ESET against ransomware while using more up-to-date competitor solutions. Had he an used updated version of ESET on that test, it would&#039;ve caught the ransomware just like the others.Edit: regarding Live Guard, unless you often download files from unknown sources, I would say it&#039;s not really worth it. You will get the signatures eventually anyway as these unknown files get flagged by ESET.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cofer123, post: 1111615, member: 92976"] Leo's testing methodology is flawed when it comes to ESET. ESET has repeatedly and clearly stated (on their forums, on their documentation and by Marcos on some of Leo's videos) that it needs all modules enabled to work. It's been like this for many years and he refuses to learn either by ignorance or actual malice at this point. His [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3co-80OeHQE']recent comparison video [/URL]is a clear example of bad testing methodology, as he uses a heavily outdated version of ESET against ransomware while using more up-to-date competitor solutions. Had he an used updated version of ESET on that test, it would've caught the ransomware just like the others. Edit: regarding Live Guard, unless you often download files from unknown sources, I would say it's not really worth it. You will get the signatures eventually anyway as these unknown files get flagged by ESET. [/QUOTE]

Verification