I think their targets are younger people; teenagers, yes, but sometimes younger adults too. If you remember the uncertainty, the possibilities, and the hormones raging during the teenage years, you would partly understand why sending nudes doesn’t seem out of the ordinary. This scolding/warning is common in these cases: nobody wants to see your dick pics.You feel for people in this situation, but then you probably shouldn't send nudes anyway to random people on the internet?
If it's these bastards doing sextortion to kids/teenagers and blackmailing them I'd suggest a missile attackon them.
As far as I could get, the OP wants just to delete all the files on the blackmailer's PC, including the photos used for blackmail.The OP could be trolling. If someone has gained unauthorized access,they can do everything and that includes monitoring for banking details or even changing pw/pins using email/sms.
If the attacker wants money,no need to interact with OP. He already have the gates open. I'm not sold on his claims.
It's unethical, sure, but... if you split the companies' riches with broke souls like me, we'll keep you in our prayers—you'll be our Robin Hood with a Tiger Mask!Is it ethical to buy a ransomware with the last money you have and then spread it and scam companies because you're broke?![]()
No need to ponder on that one. It is same as saying "I am broke, so it is excusable to rob a bank." You don't turn to crime just because you are broke. You turn to free gov't job training and other govt assistance.Is it ethical to buy a ransomware with the last money you have and then spread it and scam companies because you're broke?![]()
Put your hands in the air, Mr. @Marko :)No need to ponder on that one. It is same as saying "I am broke, so it is excusable to rob a bank." You don't turn to crime just because you are broke. You turn to free gov't job training and other govt assistance.
Exactly; when gov A use malware against gov B; gov B considers it unethical and hostile action, while gov considers it a patriotic action.In theory it's unethical, but in reality it's being done and use by novice, pros and even govt agencies. This is the real world we are living.
Yap.Exactly; when gov A use malware against gov B; gov B considers it unethical and hostile action, while gov considers it a patriotic action.
Everything is relative, except for death.
Yap.
Let's go back 2010 and say Hello to STUXNET worm.
Do not need to ask chatgpt what happens when a inexperienced person gets their hands on malware. It's not their place to approach this, that's what laws, and law enforcement is for.May be broke bank robber analogy is not quite relevant.
The poster is trying to use criminal means to Prevent a crime. Hsve to ask chatgpt for precedents.