Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stopspying" data-source="post: 1008141" data-attributes="member: 69368"><p>I&#039;ve used various &#039;Start&#039; add-ons for similar reasons, and I doubt whether we&#039;ll be unlikely to not need them in the near future either for similar reasons. MS seems to like telling us about their new bling to get us to use it before what is under the hood actually works like its claimed to, bells and whistles and shiny new things attract some. It sounds like we&#039;re similar in wanting the guts to do as intended instead. Its a way of getting a lot more unwitting &#039;beta&#039; testers onboard who were not so inclined to take on the type of role that the &#039;insiders&#039; signed up for with the pre-full release testing. Monthly updates can still make&nbsp; me feel like a &#039;beta&#039; tester (are you reading this Satya Nadella?). There are undoubtedly some good intentions and implementations that come with each Windows version release, 11 didn&#039;t swing it for me particularly, like 8 didn&#039;t, but I&#039;m hopeful that 12 might.I&#039;m not a great believer in the theory that MS have a cycle of one good, one bad OS release, but 7 &amp; 10 were nearer the mark in my view</p><h2></h2></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Stopspying, post: 1008141, member: 69368"] I've used various 'Start' add-ons for similar reasons, and I doubt whether we'll be unlikely to not need them in the near future either for similar reasons. MS seems to like telling us about their new bling to get us to use it before what is under the hood actually works like its claimed to, bells and whistles and shiny new things attract some. It sounds like we're similar in wanting the guts to do as intended instead. Its a way of getting a lot more unwitting 'beta' testers onboard who were not so inclined to take on the type of role that the 'insiders' signed up for with the pre-full release testing. Monthly updates can still make me feel like a 'beta' tester (are you reading this Satya Nadella?). There are undoubtedly some good intentions and implementations that come with each Windows version release, 11 didn't swing it for me particularly, like 8 didn't, but I'm hopeful that 12 might.I'm not a great believer in the theory that MS have a cycle of one good, one bad OS release, but 7 & 10 were nearer the mark in my view [HEADING=1][/HEADING] [/QUOTE]

Verification