Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dreams&amp;amp;Visions" data-source="post: 1108608" data-attributes="member: 118225">Wow, thank you for the heads up, did not know that!Haven&#039;t invested in a MacBook yet (maybe I&#039;m to bond to M$, IDK), but used to have iPhones and an iPod Classic (which unfortunately died lately, was quite difficult to find something comparable, good old times are long gone...).I did like the AMSI protection they added lately, it worked quite well against scriptors, which IMO was quite a weakness of FS (and is of many AV; let alone the static (=signature based) detection). I wonder if it is comparable w/ BullGuard (in terms of protection).Actually I&#039;m not sure whether DeepGuard is also tied to some cloud, which calculates the danger of the tracked malware actions? Of course, the module gets some kind of local database from time to time each week, but it&#039;s tough to test it offline, it seems to recognize malware also by hash, and many (PEEXE) malware did require outbound to trigger detection (loaders, stealer) as far as I noticed testing.I follow your guess that FS might go the way many AV have gone before, and just license technology (like Bitdefender engine being found in many AV out there, and being replaced in favour to Avira by FS also).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dreams&Visions, post: 1108608, member: 118225"] Wow, thank you for the heads up, did not know that! Haven't invested in a MacBook yet (maybe I'm to bond to M$, IDK), but used to have iPhones and an iPod Classic (which unfortunately died lately, was quite difficult to find something comparable, good old times are long gone...). I did like the AMSI protection they added lately, it worked quite well against scriptors, which IMO was quite a weakness of FS (and is of many AV; let alone the static (=signature based) detection). I wonder if it is comparable w/ BullGuard (in terms of protection). Actually I'm not sure whether DeepGuard is also tied to some cloud, which calculates the danger of the tracked malware actions? Of course, the module gets some kind of local database from time to time each week, but it's tough to test it offline, it seems to recognize malware also by hash, and many (PEEXE) malware did require outbound to trigger detection (loaders, stealer) as far as I noticed testing. I follow your guess that FS might go the way many AV have gone before, and just license technology (like Bitdefender engine being found in many AV out there, and being replaced in favour to Avira by FS also). [/QUOTE]

Verification