Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Firefox
Firefox and Chromium - Security Weaknesses Compared
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HarborFront" data-source="post: 1037081" data-attributes="member: 55987"><p>Found this article comparing the security weaknesses of FF to Chromium. Hopefully it's still valid</p><p></p><p>Firefox is sometimes recommended as a supposedly more secure browser because of its parent company's privacy practices. This article explains why this notion is not true and enumerates a number of security weaknesses in Firefox's security model when compared to Chromium. In particular, it covers the less granular process model, weaker sandboxing and lack of modern exploit mitigations. It is important to decouple privacy from security — this article does not attempt to compare the privacy practices of each browser but rather their resistance to exploitation.</p><p></p><p>Section 1 explains the weaker process model and sandboxing architecture. Section 2 examines and compares a number of important exploit mitigations. Section 3 discusses some miscellaneous topics. Finally, section 4 provides links to what other security researchers have said about this topic.</p><p></p><h2>Contents</h2><p>1. Sandboxing</p><p>2. Exploit Mitigations</p><p>3. Miscellaneous</p><p>4. Other Security Researchers' Views on Firefox</p><p></p><p>Read the whole article here</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HarborFront, post: 1037081, member: 55987"] Found this article comparing the security weaknesses of FF to Chromium. Hopefully it's still valid Firefox is sometimes recommended as a supposedly more secure browser because of its parent company's privacy practices. This article explains why this notion is not true and enumerates a number of security weaknesses in Firefox's security model when compared to Chromium. In particular, it covers the less granular process model, weaker sandboxing and lack of modern exploit mitigations. It is important to decouple privacy from security — this article does not attempt to compare the privacy practices of each browser but rather their resistance to exploitation. Section 1 explains the weaker process model and sandboxing architecture. Section 2 examines and compares a number of important exploit mitigations. Section 3 discusses some miscellaneous topics. Finally, section 4 provides links to what other security researchers have said about this topic. [HEADING=1]Contents[/HEADING] 1. Sandboxing 2. Exploit Mitigations 3. Miscellaneous 4. Other Security Researchers' Views on Firefox Read the whole article here [URL unfurl="true"]https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top