Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
News
Technology News
Firefox on the brink?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cofer123" data-source="post: 1067700" data-attributes="member: 92976"><p>Because these other browsers with lower market share all run on chromium. As such, if a site has been tested on Chrome, it will work on those browsers as well.</p><p></p><p>Years of Mozilla alienating users with hostile decisions that drove people away. Firefox initially spread during a time where IE6 was the alternative, and that was reason enough to give it a try. Word of mouth from tech enthusiasts also promoted Firefox everywhere. Then came Chrome and it was years ahead of Firefox in terms of speed and security. Mozilla took years to finally move Firefox into multiprocessing and stronger security models (which are still to this day not 100%), and Google took that widow to push Chrome everywhere. Firefox on Android is still terribly slow and memory hungry when compared to any chromium browser, and it offers little against alternative browsers like Brave or Vivaldi.</p><p></p><p>Then Mozilla, instead of playing on the strengths of Firefox, decided to replicate features Chrome had and to make it as similar as possible to Chrome to make it easier for users move from Chrome to Firefox (this is their words, not mine, from years of reading devs on bugzilla justifying their bad decisions). If I wanted Chrome, I would be on Chrome, not Chromefox.</p><p></p><p>Firefox's demise is 100% on Mozilla. I still use it, not because I like it, but because I find the alternatives worse. The best thing that could happen to Firefox is for Mozilla to cease to exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cofer123, post: 1067700, member: 92976"] Because these other browsers with lower market share all run on chromium. As such, if a site has been tested on Chrome, it will work on those browsers as well. Years of Mozilla alienating users with hostile decisions that drove people away. Firefox initially spread during a time where IE6 was the alternative, and that was reason enough to give it a try. Word of mouth from tech enthusiasts also promoted Firefox everywhere. Then came Chrome and it was years ahead of Firefox in terms of speed and security. Mozilla took years to finally move Firefox into multiprocessing and stronger security models (which are still to this day not 100%), and Google took that widow to push Chrome everywhere. Firefox on Android is still terribly slow and memory hungry when compared to any chromium browser, and it offers little against alternative browsers like Brave or Vivaldi. Then Mozilla, instead of playing on the strengths of Firefox, decided to replicate features Chrome had and to make it as similar as possible to Chrome to make it easier for users move from Chrome to Firefox (this is their words, not mine, from years of reading devs on bugzilla justifying their bad decisions). If I wanted Chrome, I would be on Chrome, not Chromefox. Firefox's demise is 100% on Mozilla. I still use it, not because I like it, but because I find the alternatives worse. The best thing that could happen to Firefox is for Mozilla to cease to exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top