Have a look at this statistics below, it makes no sense to add a anti-trackers list of say more than 3500 entries of Peter Low's blocklist.. Reasons are
1. With those 3500 entries, you probably have the TOP 1000 covered wherever you live.
2. This means that ones you don't block only have a very limited outreach (chances you are tracked over multiple websites by local trackers is low)
3. In my case (living in the Netherlands), only one company would have tracked me on 3 websites (I usually visit) and one other tracked me on 2 other websites.
ALL OTHER WEBSITES HAD SOME LOCAL TRACKERS WHICH PETER LOW's FAILED TO BLOCK, BUT THEY ONLY TRACKED ME ON ONE (1) WEBSITE!!!
Since EASYLIST and ADGUARD only offer LOCAL ADVERTISING LISTS (not local tracking list), enabling both ADGUARD TRACKING PROTECTION AND DUTCH ADVERTISING FILTER reduced my third-party exposure for trackers ONLY to two trackers which tracked me on 2 websites.
CONCLUSION: ADDING SOME 75.000 ANTI_TRACKING RULES DID NOT DECREASE MY THIRD-PARTY TRACKING EXPOSURE MUCH (COMPARED TO PETER LOW'S ONLY)
1. With those 3500 entries, you probably have the TOP 1000 covered wherever you live.
2. This means that ones you don't block only have a very limited outreach (chances you are tracked over multiple websites by local trackers is low)
3. In my case (living in the Netherlands), only one company would have tracked me on 3 websites (I usually visit) and one other tracked me on 2 other websites.
ALL OTHER WEBSITES HAD SOME LOCAL TRACKERS WHICH PETER LOW's FAILED TO BLOCK, BUT THEY ONLY TRACKED ME ON ONE (1) WEBSITE!!!
Since EASYLIST and ADGUARD only offer LOCAL ADVERTISING LISTS (not local tracking list), enabling both ADGUARD TRACKING PROTECTION AND DUTCH ADVERTISING FILTER reduced my third-party exposure for trackers ONLY to two trackers which tracked me on 2 websites.
CONCLUSION: ADDING SOME 75.000 ANTI_TRACKING RULES DID NOT DECREASE MY THIRD-PARTY TRACKING EXPOSURE MUCH (COMPARED TO PETER LOW'S ONLY)
Last edited:

