Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
FortiClient 6.0.0 (Windows)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 58943" data-source="post: 760968"><p>FortiSandbox, Application Firewall, SSO, and Secure Remote Access modules do NOTHING without the appropriate accounts/appliances in place. So you can disable them.</p><p></p><p>For proper testing a FortiClient should always be tested when paired with the appropriate hardware so all of the advanced protection modules are in place, also FortiSandbox should have 'Deny files until Sandbox Authentication' checked in a proper test. With all of the proper accounts and appliances in place FortiClient would likely score exceptionally high in tests. Without them, you should pair it up with adjunct solutions.</p><p></p><p>FortiClient Free+OSArmor+Syshardener has proved itself to a few people that it's a sufficiently powerful real world protection setup that won't cost you a penny. You are getting upper tier signatures, top tier URL filtration/traffic inspection, as well as adjunct technologies to cover areas FortiClient Free might not.</p><p></p><p>I've successfully implemented that combo on 'clicker' relatives systems and they've remained totally clean for years. As a bonus, all telemetry/logging can be completely disabled on FortiClient. Those options are there because some secure facilities that use it cannot have any egress of logs. (for obvious reasons)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 58943, post: 760968"] FortiSandbox, Application Firewall, SSO, and Secure Remote Access modules do NOTHING without the appropriate accounts/appliances in place. So you can disable them. For proper testing a FortiClient should always be tested when paired with the appropriate hardware so all of the advanced protection modules are in place, also FortiSandbox should have 'Deny files until Sandbox Authentication' checked in a proper test. With all of the proper accounts and appliances in place FortiClient would likely score exceptionally high in tests. Without them, you should pair it up with adjunct solutions. FortiClient Free+OSArmor+Syshardener has proved itself to a few people that it's a sufficiently powerful real world protection setup that won't cost you a penny. You are getting upper tier signatures, top tier URL filtration/traffic inspection, as well as adjunct technologies to cover areas FortiClient Free might not. I've successfully implemented that combo on 'clicker' relatives systems and they've remained totally clean for years. As a bonus, all telemetry/logging can be completely disabled on FortiClient. Those options are there because some secure facilities that use it cannot have any egress of logs. (for obvious reasons) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top