Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
G-Data is using a load of RAM.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kongo" data-source="post: 890013" data-attributes="member: 59691"><p>Yes I do, even tho I don't really wanna accept it cause you're replying like you own G-Data and want to protect it with your life <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite126" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" />. Anyway, it's true that there are only those three options. But let me explain what I mean. It's just like buying a bad optimized game which has so much potential but isn't playable on most machines. Thats basically the same with G-Data. Everybody, or at least most people should be able to use it, and not only people with high-end machines. I'm not saying that it is not like you said, I'm just saying that G-Data products are not in an acceptable state in my opinion. Even tho they use Bitdefender's engine, they can be improved a lot in terms of RAM usage. G-Data was always known for being pretty heavy, which I don't feel now anymore. The only problem is the RAM usage which can be improved with a Engine switch for example. Now I'd appreciate it if you could stop acting "super smart" and rather try to get what I'm trying to say <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite121" alt=":cautious:" title="Cautious :cautious:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cautious:" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kongo, post: 890013, member: 59691"] Yes I do, even tho I don't really wanna accept it cause you're replying like you own G-Data and want to protect it with your life :ROFLMAO:. Anyway, it's true that there are only those three options. But let me explain what I mean. It's just like buying a bad optimized game which has so much potential but isn't playable on most machines. Thats basically the same with G-Data. Everybody, or at least most people should be able to use it, and not only people with high-end machines. I'm not saying that it is not like you said, I'm just saying that G-Data products are not in an acceptable state in my opinion. Even tho they use Bitdefender's engine, they can be improved a lot in terms of RAM usage. G-Data was always known for being pretty heavy, which I don't feel now anymore. The only problem is the RAM usage which can be improved with a Engine switch for example. Now I'd appreciate it if you could stop acting "super smart" and rather try to get what I'm trying to say :cautious:. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top