Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MeltdownEnemy" data-source="post: 815815" data-attributes="member: 69509"><p>Every day that passes Opera falls more into the ridiculous by adding nonsense to his own browser and its cloned variants. When it started it was very good, very simple, friendly and practical keeping its interactivity with the users and their habits. Some people were looking for the alternation ussage between firefox and chrome and later to the super fast &amp; light &quot;Opera&quot; as a third option that would soon become very popular for its low consumption of resources and basic interface that made it comfortable to use, running away from Google Chrome for its resounding changes with which they try to submit people to become Robotic Consumer User insider beta preview mode all the time: (ugly skin themes, heavy, icons, animations, transcisions, SVG animated balls, material design) stupid and unnecessary things just to push you to buy a new dispositive every year when released on the stores, you don&#039;t have the option to choose if you want to have your browser updated without swallowing all that fluid, fat polymer design material. Even so, Chrome is still better and faster than Opera, because Opera was seduced and obsessed by those stupid implementations, much more than Chrome, if you install Opera on an old amd athlon 2011, with a single-dual core and with integrated graphic nvidia quadro, you with OPERA using youtube videos the behavior reenderized is super slow and gives more kicks to be able to open heavy websites like youtube, facebook and twitter. Sorry for my testimony,&nbsp; I tried to do many things to recover the speed of that browser and nothing, Chrome with its nonsense is better polished that Opera although it does not stop being so an abuser of the graphics of people who play with toys.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="MeltdownEnemy, post: 815815, member: 69509"] Every day that passes Opera falls more into the ridiculous by adding nonsense to his own browser and its cloned variants. When it started it was very good, very simple, friendly and practical keeping its interactivity with the users and their habits. Some people were looking for the alternation ussage between firefox and chrome and later to the super fast & light "Opera" as a third option that would soon become very popular for its low consumption of resources and basic interface that made it comfortable to use, running away from Google Chrome for its resounding changes with which they try to submit people to become Robotic Consumer User insider beta preview mode all the time: (ugly skin themes, heavy, icons, animations, transcisions, SVG animated balls, material design) stupid and unnecessary things just to push you to buy a new dispositive every year when released on the stores, you don't have the option to choose if you want to have your browser updated without swallowing all that fluid, fat polymer design material. Even so, Chrome is still better and faster than Opera, because Opera was seduced and obsessed by those stupid implementations, much more than Chrome, if you install Opera on an old amd athlon 2011, with a single-dual core and with integrated graphic nvidia quadro, you with OPERA using youtube videos the behavior reenderized is super slow and gives more kicks to be able to open heavy websites like youtube, facebook and twitter. Sorry for my testimony, I tried to do many things to recover the speed of that browser and nothing, Chrome with its nonsense is better polished that Opera although it does not stop being so an abuser of the graphics of people who play with toys. [/QUOTE]

Verification