Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Good companions for CruelComodo (CIS)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ebocious" data-source="post: 974599" data-attributes="member: 75834"><p>Up ’til now, I’ve been using MD (WD) and CD with Cruel CFW on most of my systems. I’ve made myself at home with CFW, adding an ignored folder separate from Downloads in each user, so I can install software without having to toggle auto-containment. But MD is just too heavy on this particular unit. It takes forever to scan a process before launch. On newer systems, it’s nothing. But not this one. MD took longer than CAV and WV combined.</p><p></p><p>Even though I knew I couldn’t use MD on this machine, I looked up DefenderUI upon your recommendation, and it looks delicious. So many controls! But then I think about it, and I see how it could get pretty frustrating to keep track of them all, in the event that a single switch stops me from accessing something legitimate. I would probably just toggle the protection altogether in such instances, leaving Comodo as a single point of failure.</p><p></p><p>I’m pleased to say that the laptop is still usable with Cruel CIS and WV. A bit slow, but usable. And it’s actually kind of nice, when I consider that I have two sentinel apps (besides AppCheck and MBAE), one with signatures and one that’s entirely focused on behaviors — on top of UAC and DEP on max settings, Neustar DNS, uBO, BDTL, and MDBP — to take action in case of weaknesses in auto-containment. I’m liking this new apparatus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ebocious, post: 974599, member: 75834"] Up ’til now, I’ve been using MD (WD) and CD with Cruel CFW on most of my systems. I’ve made myself at home with CFW, adding an ignored folder separate from Downloads in each user, so I can install software without having to toggle auto-containment. But MD is just too heavy on this particular unit. It takes forever to scan a process before launch. On newer systems, it’s nothing. But not this one. MD took longer than CAV and WV combined. Even though I knew I couldn’t use MD on this machine, I looked up DefenderUI upon your recommendation, and it looks delicious. So many controls! But then I think about it, and I see how it could get pretty frustrating to keep track of them all, in the event that a single switch stops me from accessing something legitimate. I would probably just toggle the protection altogether in such instances, leaving Comodo as a single point of failure. I’m pleased to say that the laptop is still usable with Cruel CIS and WV. A bit slow, but usable. And it’s actually kind of nice, when I consider that I have two sentinel apps (besides AppCheck and MBAE), one with signatures and one that’s entirely focused on behaviors — on top of UAC and DEP on max settings, Neustar DNS, uBO, BDTL, and MDBP — to take action in case of weaknesses in auto-containment. I’m liking this new apparatus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top