Google tries to hide incriminating emails

  • Thread starter Thread starter illumination
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The U.S. patent system is broken and needs a complete teardown, at this point it's very hard to write a code without violating a few patents...
The best way for Google to handle this situation would be an agreement with Oracle. :)
 
Jack said:
The U.S. patent system is broken and needs a complete teardown, at this point it's very hard to write a code without violating a few patents...
The best way for Google to handle this situation would be an agreement with Oracle. :)
Click to expand...

Completely agree with you, at this point an agreement would be best.
 
And Apple is sued over Mac OS X 'quick boot'

A lawsuit has accused Apple of violating a patent describing a means of "quickly booting a computer system".

Late last week, an outfit calling itself Operating Systems Solutions filed suit in the Middle District of Florida, claiming that Apple infringes its patent with Mac OS X. As pointed out by Patently Apple, the patent in question – RE840,092 – was originally granted to LG Electronics.

The patent describes a method for quickly booting a personal computer system using information that was previously saved to hard disk. This information includes data from memory and the status of devices attached to the system, and it hinges on a POST routine.

Read more
Click to expand...
 
Ugh. I hate this stupid patenting BS. They should not last nearly as long as they do.
 
Hungry Man said:
Ugh. I hate this stupid patenting BS. They should not last nearly as long as they do.
Click to expand...

Google and Apple aren't innocent, the developers had to know that they were breaking some patents when developing the products (If so it would be fair to pay for their use) but I must admit that a review of the U.S. patent system would be a good idea since now days the world is moving a lot faster...
 
The big problem with the patent system is the vague descriptions that people are trying to say is their patent and that people are infringing on it. As in the article Jack linked to, Apple isn't even following the same methods described in the patent, but nonetheless, the company owning that patent feels they can sue Apple for doing something that is merely similar.

It's a bit like someone saying they own the concept of a car... Even if someone produces something that has a completely different propulsion system and completely different mechanics, someone will sue saying that the idea of a wheeled system for transporting goods or people is theirs. :rolleyes:
 
IIRC Google has already removed the code that belonged to Oracle and it didn't even belong in the official releases anyways and was only used for development.

In fact I believe Oracle recognized this and then later on said that they didn't care.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

You may also like...