Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Guides - Privacy & Security Tips
Hardening your HOST file
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jelson" data-source="post: 13415" data-attributes="member: 310"><p>I don't understand it either. But I believe that FAQ was written several years ago and systems now are considerably faster. </p><p></p><p>I've been using a MVP HOSTS file for several months and haven't disabled DSN Client. Haven't done any testing to really see what the performance hit acutally is, but I don't really notice anything (XP SP3 on Core2Duo 1.86 GHz with 1.5 GB DDR2).</p><p></p><p>I also read that disabling DNS caching will also prevent Network Discovery from working.</p><p></p><p>So far, I'm quite pleased with MVP HOSTS file (no pressing need to install AdBlock since it stops most annoying ads.) I've also looked at using</p><p>HpHOSTS file which is even more extensive, but it's HUGE in comparison:</p><p>3.8 MB (HpHOSTS) vs 0.62 MB (MVP HOSTS)</p><p></p><p>While attempting to understand the whole DNS Client issue, I also found some posts on WildersSecurity critiquing the use of HOSTS for protection against malware. (I forget all the reasons given but mainly remember that HOSTS files were orginally designed as a networking aid)</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I use HostsXpert to manage my HOSTS file but plan on trying HOSTMan and I also use Norton DNS for primary and secondary DNS servers with Google DNS in the tertiary slot in my router config.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jelson, post: 13415, member: 310"] I don't understand it either. But I believe that FAQ was written several years ago and systems now are considerably faster. I've been using a MVP HOSTS file for several months and haven't disabled DSN Client. Haven't done any testing to really see what the performance hit acutally is, but I don't really notice anything (XP SP3 on Core2Duo 1.86 GHz with 1.5 GB DDR2). I also read that disabling DNS caching will also prevent Network Discovery from working. So far, I'm quite pleased with MVP HOSTS file (no pressing need to install AdBlock since it stops most annoying ads.) I've also looked at using HpHOSTS file which is even more extensive, but it's HUGE in comparison: 3.8 MB (HpHOSTS) vs 0.62 MB (MVP HOSTS) While attempting to understand the whole DNS Client issue, I also found some posts on WildersSecurity critiquing the use of HOSTS for protection against malware. (I forget all the reasons given but mainly remember that HOSTS files were orginally designed as a networking aid) Anyway, I use HostsXpert to manage my HOSTS file but plan on trying HOSTMan and I also use Norton DNS for primary and secondary DNS servers with Google DNS in the tertiary slot in my router config. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top