Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Chrome & Chromium
Here comes the Google Chrome change that worried ad blocker creators
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 959068"><p><strong>The big problem for adblocking extensions is that the Static filters can only be updated when the extension is updated. </strong></p><p></p><p>Edge uses the Disconnect data base (with less than 5000 rules) it has no problem updating the filters, since these filters focus on (third-party) ad and tracking networks (like my own list). This approach requires very little rule maintenance. In the worst case scenario Microsoft could always push a browser update.</p><p></p><p><strong>Dynamic filters can be updated and used over sessions, but the problem is that they are limited in numbers (less than 5000 when I recall correctly) </strong></p><p></p><p>Microsoft already has a local version of rules like websites with excessive advertising list (Edge/User Data/Ad blocking) and the old place where the disconnect lists were stored (Edge/User Data/Trust Protection Lists). It can use these sets for ad hoc corrections and overrules to correct any website breakage.</p><p></p><p>So Microsoft has no problem with manifest V3, same applies for the build-in anti-tracking feature of Firefox.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 959068"] [B]The big problem for adblocking extensions is that the Static filters can only be updated when the extension is updated. [/B] Edge uses the Disconnect data base (with less than 5000 rules) it has no problem updating the filters, since these filters focus on (third-party) ad and tracking networks (like my own list). This approach requires very little rule maintenance. In the worst case scenario Microsoft could always push a browser update. [B]Dynamic filters can be updated and used over sessions, but the problem is that they are limited in numbers (less than 5000 when I recall correctly) [/B] Microsoft already has a local version of rules like websites with excessive advertising list (Edge/User Data/Ad blocking) and the old place where the disconnect lists were stored (Edge/User Data/Trust Protection Lists). It can use these sets for ad hoc corrections and overrules to correct any website breakage. So Microsoft has no problem with manifest V3, same applies for the build-in anti-tracking feature of Firefox. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top