Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Chrome & Chromium
Here comes the Google Chrome change that worried ad blocker creators
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 959233"><p>Adblocking on DNS level can only block resolve requests (find an IP adres for this URL domain), it can't modify CSS styling, can't strip/redirect elements out of HTML and can't inject javascript.</p><p></p><p>DNS level adblocking really is no alternative for content filtering with extensions. DNS adblocking is using a mechanism to block bad URL's used for malware, phising, command & control servers.</p><p></p><p>The reverse is also true, malware blocking using local URL blocklists is also silly (covers at best 1 percent of the blacklist used at DNS and Antivirus Companies have in the cloud).</p><p></p><p>Malware URL blocking with local URL blocklist in your adblocker is like using a speed boat for world wide cargo transport.</p><p></p><p>When a DNS blocks a request to a bad URL, the intended use is to break the (malware) delivery chain. It is all or nothing. It is a sledge hammer compared to the tweezers of adblock rules</p><p></p><p>Just open Easylist filter and search for @@ (allow exception) and 'important' (giving priority to a block rule over an allow rule) or 'third-party' (block as third-party, allow first-party). And these three examples are the easy ones, this are not the cosmetic rules or advanced CSS, HTML and javascript(let) rules I mentioned earlier.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PS</p><p>I am using DNS level blocking of advertisement for my android TV box (because that is the best I get for free on that device).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 959233"] Adblocking on DNS level can only block resolve requests (find an IP adres for this URL domain), it can't modify CSS styling, can't strip/redirect elements out of HTML and can't inject javascript. DNS level adblocking really is no alternative for content filtering with extensions. DNS adblocking is using a mechanism to block bad URL's used for malware, phising, command & control servers. The reverse is also true, malware blocking using local URL blocklists is also silly (covers at best 1 percent of the blacklist used at DNS and Antivirus Companies have in the cloud). Malware URL blocking with local URL blocklist in your adblocker is like using a speed boat for world wide cargo transport. When a DNS blocks a request to a bad URL, the intended use is to break the (malware) delivery chain. It is all or nothing. It is a sledge hammer compared to the tweezers of adblock rules Just open Easylist filter and search for @@ (allow exception) and 'important' (giving priority to a block rule over an allow rule) or 'third-party' (block as third-party, allow first-party). And these three examples are the easy ones, this are not the cosmetic rules or advanced CSS, HTML and javascript(let) rules I mentioned earlier. PS I am using DNS level blocking of advertisement for my android TV box (because that is the best I get for free on that device). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top