Heuristics - Mean

Umbra Corp. said:
MrExplorer said:
Ok, Comodo Internet Security is too Good but i thing lack of Features.

seriously?!

AV + FW + BB + HIPS + Cloud + Kiosk + Full Sandbox + File Rating + Killswitch + Autorun + CCE...? not enough features for you :D
Not enough for me. :D
No seriously as said above CIS uses CAMAS for all the new unknown binaries and if detected as suspicious signature is generated in next signature ...
http://www.comodo.com/home/internet-security/updates/vdp/database.php
But CAV seriously has A BIG LACK of generic signs .... Nothing detected on 0days, only detected after sandboxed, (as Cloud.Behavior).
 
Umbra Corp. said:
By using a secured DNS or a patched Hosts file you avoid the need of a Web Filter.

You don't need a web filter even if you don't use either of these techniques. With an on-demand scanner, a web filter is redundant.
 
HeffeD said:
Umbra Corp. said:
By using a secured DNS or a patched Hosts file you avoid the need of a Web Filter.

You don't need a web filter even if you don't use either of these techniques. With an on-demand scanner, a web filter is redundant.

Comodo DNS is too good as from the past time but Comodo DNS is not good in my Country.(Slow Down the Internet)
 
MrExplorer said:
HeffeD said:
Umbra Corp. said:
By using a secured DNS or a patched Hosts file you avoid the need of a Web Filter.

You don't need a web filter even if you don't use either of these techniques. With an on-demand scanner, a web filter is redundant.

Comodo DNS is too good as from the past time but Comodo DNS is not good in my Country.(Slow Down the Internet)

I have always preferred to use HostsMan with MVPS host file blocklist, you have better control and it doesn't slow down web browsing.

In my area my default DNS is much faster than all of the third-party DNS services. Most third-party DNS services have false positives that blocks good sites, they are too aggressive and so are most url blockers.

Thanks.:D