Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 770529">My views aren&#039;t popular, which I really don&#039;t care.There was a time when the digital world was all about discovery and exploration, people doing stuff to see what they could do, freewares, basically the wild-wild west of people doing whatever they wanted - and Microsoft and OEMs catered to that. However, we&#039;re decades on and things have to change. There is big money losses nowadays. The most effective and efficient change can be made by Microsoft. That is where the change has to come from. Windows 10 S was a feeble attempt that sputtered because no one really wants Microsoft&#039;s expensive tablets.Restricted use does not mean inconvenient. There are people that have these PCs with Windows on it and use it only to surf the web, watch a movie in the browser, perhaps write a document now and then. Their PC is ridiculous for what they need. All they need is a Chromebook with no access to the web or Android store.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="509322, post: 770529"] My views aren't popular, which I really don't care. There was a time when the digital world was all about discovery and exploration, people doing stuff to see what they could do, freewares, basically the wild-wild west of people doing whatever they wanted - and Microsoft and OEMs catered to that. However, we're decades on and things have to change. There is big money losses nowadays. The most effective and efficient change can be made by Microsoft. That is where the change has to come from. Windows 10 S was a feeble attempt that sputtered because no one really wants Microsoft's expensive tablets. Restricted use does not mean inconvenient. There are people that have these PCs with Windows on it and use it only to surf the web, watch a movie in the browser, perhaps write a document now and then. Their PC is ridiculous for what they need. All they need is a Chromebook with no access to the web or Android store. [/QUOTE]

Verification