Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Malware Analysis
How big are your chances to be infected?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 916477" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>[USER=89360]@McMcbrad[/USER] has focused my attention on the potential problem of increasing the new malware samples. If so, then this effect should be also included in the formula (it is not for this moment).</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]250090[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p><s>Although this will not probably cause a change in the infection rate, but it can increase the average number of AV alerts (about 10% of total malware in the year 2020). So instead of 10, we should use (1.1+1,2+1.3+...2.0) = 15.5</s></p><p><s>The chance will grow proportionally by 1.55:</s></p><p><s>4.82% * 1.55 ~ 7.5%</s></p><p><s></s></p><p><s>Edit.</s></p><p><s>The exact formula:</s></p><p><s>c = {1 - { [ (1 - r)^(a*1.55) ]*[ (1 - R)^(b*1.55) ] }^n } * 100% ~ 7.4%</s></p><p><s>a=1, b=3, r=30/7340, R=60/213000, n=10</s></p><p></p><p>Edit.</p><p>I had to update/edit this post. The table does not show the increase of new malware a year as [USER=89179]@Minimalist[/USER] noticed in his posts. The number of new malware a year is about 140 mln (2013-2020) and it is approximately constant. So, the correction in the formula is not required.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 916477, member: 32260"] [USER=89360]@McMcbrad[/USER] has focused my attention on the potential problem of increasing the new malware samples. If so, then this effect should be also included in the formula (it is not for this moment). [ATTACH type="full" alt="1606761944982.png"]250090[/ATTACH] [S]Although this will not probably cause a change in the infection rate, but it can increase the average number of AV alerts (about 10% of total malware in the year 2020). So instead of 10, we should use (1.1+1,2+1.3+...2.0) = 15.5 The chance will grow proportionally by 1.55: 4.82% * 1.55 ~ 7.5% Edit. The exact formula: c = {1 - { [ (1 - r)^(a*1.55) ]*[ (1 - R)^(b*1.55) ] }^n } * 100% ~ 7.4% a=1, b=3, r=30/7340, R=60/213000, n=10[/S] Edit. I had to update/edit this post. The table does not show the increase of new malware a year as [USER=89179]@Minimalist[/USER] noticed in his posts. The number of new malware a year is about 140 mln (2013-2020) and it is approximately constant. So, the correction in the formula is not required. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top