Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1122778" data-attributes="member: 114717">It is locked down even more than S Mode.That is not the fault of the security configuration. Security cannot cover everything while at the same time cater to productivity and convenience first. It is just not possible.When it comes to the &quot;average user,&quot; the problem is the user. The user is ALWAYS the problem - and by user I mean any person that manages or uses a system.There is no software that can completely protect ANY user from digitally harming themselves or others.At some point, one has to leave average users to their own inclinations. Just move on and leave them behind. Because the amount of effort that is required to protect users who don&#039;t care, don&#039;t know and don&#039;t prioritize security is just too much effort, too costly, and impractical.Security is not software (and configurations). It is a process (that requires knowledge and disciplined habits).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1122778, member: 114717"] It is locked down even more than S Mode. That is not the fault of the security configuration. Security cannot cover everything while at the same time cater to productivity and convenience first. It is just not possible. When it comes to the "average user," the problem is the user. The user is ALWAYS the problem - and by user I mean any person that manages or uses a system. There is no software that can completely protect ANY user from digitally harming themselves or others. At some point, one has to leave average users to their own inclinations. Just move on and leave them behind. Because the amount of effort that is required to protect users who don't care, don't know and don't prioritize security is just too much effort, too costly, and impractical. Security is not software (and configurations). It is a process (that requires knowledge and disciplined habits). [/QUOTE]

Verification