Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kaffee4Eck" data-source="post: 1122844" data-attributes="member: 46308">I also gave pfSense a try, but eventually settled on OPNsense. Simply put, it offers a more modern GUI/WebUI and faster feature upgrades and updates. I wouldn’t necessarily call it “bleeding edge,” but you do get access to newer systems, services, packages, and extensions a bit earlier.I also find the OPNsense community to be larger and more active compared to pfSense. That said, the differences between the two are relatively minor. In the end, I just felt more comfortable and better supported with OPNsense.I also used Sophos UTM for a while, but after all the licensing changes and other shifts around 2014–2016, I moved away from it fairly quickly. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😄" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :smile:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f604.png" data-shortname=":smile:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kaffee4Eck, post: 1122844, member: 46308"] I also gave [B]pfSense[/B] a try, but eventually settled on [B]OPNsense[/B]. Simply put, it offers a more modern [B]GUI/WebUI[/B] and faster feature upgrades and updates. I wouldn’t necessarily call it “bleeding edge,” but you do get access to newer systems, services, packages, and extensions a bit earlier. I also find the [B]OPNsense community[/B] to be larger and more active compared to pfSense. That said, the differences between the two are relatively minor. In the end, I just felt more comfortable and better supported with OPNsense. I also used [B]Sophos UTM[/B] for a while, but after all the licensing changes and other shifts around 2014–2016, I moved away from it fairly quickly. 😄 [/QUOTE]

Verification