Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 828137" data-attributes="member: 32260">[USER=80927]@Opcode[/USER],We agree, just try to be more polite. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite135" alt=":giggle:" title="Giggle&nbsp; &nbsp; :giggle:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":giggle:" /> I usually like your post until they become too much personal.Your statements are true from the technical viewpoint, but the real world is sometimes more complicated. For example, Google has other methods to frighten away AV vendors from injecting the code to the web browser. Both parties have to make an agreement for the good of their customers.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />Edit.I understand your objections about MemProtect, but I do not think that it is crap (yet, it would be off-topic discussion here).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 828137, member: 32260"] [USER=80927]@Opcode[/USER], We agree, just try to be more polite. :giggle: I usually like your post until they become too much personal. Your statements are true from the technical viewpoint, but the real world is sometimes more complicated. For example, Google has other methods to frighten away AV vendors from injecting the code to the web browser. Both parties have to make an agreement for the good of their customers.(y) Edit. I understand your objections about MemProtect, but I do not think that it is crap (yet, it would be off-topic discussion here). [/QUOTE]

Verification