Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hardware
Hardware Troubleshooting
How to set up 2 DHCP servers in a single network?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Digerati" data-source="post: 705993" data-attributes="member: 59833"><p>The vast majority don't. And that's just fine. </p><p></p><p>To suggest your networked devices are <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">"Unprotected"</span></strong> without this CUJO (or eBlocker) device is pure <em>marketing</em> scare tactics hogwash! We don't need these devices. Now if you want it, that's fine, but don't think for a second your current router and your devices' security are not protecting you already. And you certainly don't need both CUJO and eBlocker. </p><p></p><p>Our biggest threat is ourselves. The user is, was, and always will be the weakest link in security. We just need to keep Windows updated, use a decent and current anti-malware solution, and don't be "click-happy" on unsolicited attachments, links, downloads and popups. </p><p></p><p>Understand routers already act as a very effective network firewall (even basic routers) with DHCP. Better routers incorporate SPI (stateful packet inspection) for even greater hardware based firewall protection.</p><p></p><p>****</p><p></p><p>It is not clear (to me anyway) what you are trying to do. The idea is to run all your network devices through the CUJO device. Connecting directly to the router, as shown with the notebook in that one image) defeats the purpose of the CUJO device. </p><p></p><p>What devices do you have?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Digerati, post: 705993, member: 59833"] The vast majority don't. And that's just fine. To suggest your networked devices are [B][COLOR=#ff0000]"Unprotected"[/COLOR][/B] without this CUJO (or eBlocker) device is pure [I]marketing[/I] scare tactics hogwash! We don't need these devices. Now if you want it, that's fine, but don't think for a second your current router and your devices' security are not protecting you already. And you certainly don't need both CUJO and eBlocker. Our biggest threat is ourselves. The user is, was, and always will be the weakest link in security. We just need to keep Windows updated, use a decent and current anti-malware solution, and don't be "click-happy" on unsolicited attachments, links, downloads and popups. Understand routers already act as a very effective network firewall (even basic routers) with DHCP. Better routers incorporate SPI (stateful packet inspection) for even greater hardware based firewall protection. **** It is not clear (to me anyway) what you are trying to do. The idea is to run all your network devices through the CUJO device. Connecting directly to the router, as shown with the notebook in that one image) defeats the purpose of the CUJO device. What devices do you have? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top