- Dec 30, 2012
- 4,809
Immunet 6.0 Review | CISCO
- Thread starter Venustus
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
- Feb 22, 2013
- 451
- Dec 17, 2014
- 1,355
Didn't do no where near as well as I thought it would. Quite disappointing.
- Jun 24, 2016
- 2,485
Your fault for believing on Immunet lol
Immunet is to be used as a companion AV/AM software not as a primary AV/AM
As for ransomware protection you either use a dedicated anti-ransomware software or use your primary AV/AM with strong anti-ransomware protection
As for ransomware protection you either use a dedicated anti-ransomware software or use your primary AV/AM with strong anti-ransomware protection
- Jun 22, 2014
- 864
Good review but no real surprises such as detection rate which will vary anyway depending on being lucky with samples used on a given day.
No surprise that the ransomware executed as Immunet doesn't have any zero day protection apart from the sigs.
V6 comes with Clamwin enabled making it as heavy a hog never mind the FP`s. When I tried to disable Clamwin I lost the realtime protection of the cloud engines which for me is the whole point of Immunet.
V5 thankfully is still doing what it`s supposed to do i.e. run light using the cloud engines only.
Regards Eck
No surprise that the ransomware executed as Immunet doesn't have any zero day protection apart from the sigs.
V6 comes with Clamwin enabled making it as heavy a hog never mind the FP`s. When I tried to disable Clamwin I lost the realtime protection of the cloud engines which for me is the whole point of Immunet.
V5 thankfully is still doing what it`s supposed to do i.e. run light using the cloud engines only.
Regards Eck
Similar threads
