Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
In hot pursuit of elusive threats: AI-driven behavior-based blocking stops attacks in their tracks
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 838749" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>Exactly.</p><p></p><p>Spanks is getting a little ridiculous in all this.</p><p></p><p>What he's talking about is called 'negative externalities' in economics. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]227202[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>So when we (the state, country..) allow consumers to purchase and use equipment that negatively affects others, they should pay a price for it to cover the costs of the negative effects of others, or the government should regulate the negative externality out of existence.</p><p></p><p>I agree with the concept totally. </p><p></p><p>So in the USA, where we have the negative externality of over 30,000 gun deaths annually because people cannot use and protect weapons in any sort of legit way, there is a resulting huge death toll every year. And this is hugely wrong.</p><p></p><p>So when we start the door-to-door gun roundup to mitigate the annual USA gun slaughter, we can also start the roundup of all computers that might infect our neighbors. </p><p></p><p>Yeah, that's it. That's the answer. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 838749, member: 72439"] Exactly. Spanks is getting a little ridiculous in all this. What he's talking about is called 'negative externalities' in economics. [ATTACH type="full"]227202[/ATTACH] So when we (the state, country..) allow consumers to purchase and use equipment that negatively affects others, they should pay a price for it to cover the costs of the negative effects of others, or the government should regulate the negative externality out of existence. I agree with the concept totally. So in the USA, where we have the negative externality of over 30,000 gun deaths annually because people cannot use and protect weapons in any sort of legit way, there is a resulting huge death toll every year. And this is hugely wrong. So when we start the door-to-door gun roundup to mitigate the annual USA gun slaughter, we can also start the roundup of all computers that might infect our neighbors. Yeah, that's it. That's the answer. :rolleyes: , [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top