Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="truefacts" data-source="post: 889561" data-attributes="member: 87912"><p>That it is still used does not matter. It is used only because of cost. And the cost is so low because it is legacy. It is outdated technology even with the vast improvements over the decades. HDD are not intended to run an OS on it. The HDD use case in this day and age is for data storage. Just because people continue to use HDD and it is widely used, does not make it Microsoft's priority.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What is posted on a forum has no influence. Of course Microsoft does not care. Of course WD is not optimized to work on HDD. Microsoft never intended to do so for a lot of reasons that people here either do not know or refuse to accept. All one need do is search for Microsoft's official positions on hardware. Support stops. They EOL efforts all the time.</p><p></p><p>I do not think Microsoft is blameless in certain cases. But the technology has been overcome by other events. And that is SSDs rise to supremacy in the market place and HDD relegated to data storage legacy. People are triggered because their perspective is that Microsoft is screwing them over by being negligent in making WD better on obsolete HDD. Microsoft doesn't want to do that. It is a lost cause money losing effort for them.</p><p></p><p>There is nothing for anyone to get upset about. Accept reality for what it is. Not what they want it to be. You can see the triggered people that keep jumping in and saying HDD is not legacy. It sure is. It is obsolete technology. Anyone in IT knows that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="truefacts, post: 889561, member: 87912"] That it is still used does not matter. It is used only because of cost. And the cost is so low because it is legacy. It is outdated technology even with the vast improvements over the decades. HDD are not intended to run an OS on it. The HDD use case in this day and age is for data storage. Just because people continue to use HDD and it is widely used, does not make it Microsoft's priority. What is posted on a forum has no influence. Of course Microsoft does not care. Of course WD is not optimized to work on HDD. Microsoft never intended to do so for a lot of reasons that people here either do not know or refuse to accept. All one need do is search for Microsoft's official positions on hardware. Support stops. They EOL efforts all the time. I do not think Microsoft is blameless in certain cases. But the technology has been overcome by other events. And that is SSDs rise to supremacy in the market place and HDD relegated to data storage legacy. People are triggered because their perspective is that Microsoft is screwing them over by being negligent in making WD better on obsolete HDD. Microsoft doesn't want to do that. It is a lost cause money losing effort for them. There is nothing for anyone to get upset about. Accept reality for what it is. Not what they want it to be. You can see the triggered people that keep jumping in and saying HDD is not legacy. It sure is. It is obsolete technology. Anyone in IT knows that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top