Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 889577"><p>And that's totally cool!</p><p></p><p>As I've said there will always be a range of experiences when it comes to AVs and performance, WD is no exception. Granted I, like many others have had great performance from WD, it's well known that not everyone will. There are so many factors that play into this, but a large part has to do with the infinite number of hardware/software configs on the Windows ecosystem. All my systems have SSDs, one being an NVME drive. The lowest amount of ram between all my systems is 8GB, so I won't place my systems under the low end category, but I can appreciate that not everyone has such systems. All in all whether you use/like WD, or not, it doesn't matter at the end of the day. All that matters is there is a large selection of AVs to choose from, all of which have their pro's and cons. All one has to do is just try them out for themselves and use the one that works for them/meets their needs.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite140" alt=":emoji_beer:" title="Beer :emoji_beer:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":emoji_beer:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 889577"] And that's totally cool! As I've said there will always be a range of experiences when it comes to AVs and performance, WD is no exception. Granted I, like many others have had great performance from WD, it's well known that not everyone will. There are so many factors that play into this, but a large part has to do with the infinite number of hardware/software configs on the Windows ecosystem. All my systems have SSDs, one being an NVME drive. The lowest amount of ram between all my systems is 8GB, so I won't place my systems under the low end category, but I can appreciate that not everyone has such systems. All in all whether you use/like WD, or not, it doesn't matter at the end of the day. All that matters is there is a large selection of AVs to choose from, all of which have their pro's and cons. All one has to do is just try them out for themselves and use the one that works for them/meets their needs.(y):emoji_beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top