Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 892970" data-attributes="member: 32260">You have probably noticed the fragment: &quot;There is no formally accepted definition of LEGACY SYSTEM&quot;. So, this definition is only the author&#039;s proposition and it is not better than other definitions (as I already noticed in one of my posts). Furthermore, it contains another interesting fragment: &quot;is deemed not to satisfy current regulatory expectations.&quot;This definition has nothing to do with your statements and rather confirms that HDD is not legacy yet.I have a proposition. If you want to continue the discussion about legacy systems, legacy technology, and legacy HDDs then it is not appropriate here. Please open a separate thread, because this long discussion is off-topic here.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />Edit.It is possible to move the off-topic posts about a legacy to the new thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 892970, member: 32260"] You have probably noticed the fragment: "There is no formally accepted definition of LEGACY SYSTEM". So, this definition is only the author's proposition and it is not better than other definitions (as I already noticed in one of my posts). Furthermore, it contains another interesting fragment: "is deemed not to satisfy current regulatory expectations." This definition has nothing to do with your statements and rather confirms that HDD is not legacy yet. I have a proposition. If you want to continue the discussion about legacy systems, legacy technology, and legacy HDDs then it is not appropriate here. Please open a separate thread, because this long discussion is [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]off-topic[/COLOR][/B] here.(y) Edit. It is possible to move the off-topic posts about a legacy to the new thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification