Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brigantes" data-source="post: 893133" data-attributes="member: 88084"><p>My argument, and the argument of others, is all in this thread. You just have to read all the posts from the initial OP post. All of it is self-explanatory. Despite what you say, there are a lot of people who get upset about the topic of HDD being legacy. You obviously did not read all the posts.</p><p></p><p>There is an ongoing debate. And this is where the problem comes in at MalwareTips. As soon as you people get upset, then you all do your utmost to shut down the discussion. That is why there are literally thousands of threads here that have been locked. Not to mention so many members banned. This place just isn't a very credible place to discuss much of anything unless a poster is part of the hive agenda and mob rule.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>HDD discussion is not off-topic. It is relevant to WD performance because WD performs differently on legacy HDD versus current tech SSD. The whole point of the thread is to answer "</p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?</strong></span></p><p>"</p><p>That cannot be answered without first identifying whether WD is running on a HDD or SSD. Any discussion not identifying the drive type is highly mis-leading.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brigantes, post: 893133, member: 88084"] My argument, and the argument of others, is all in this thread. You just have to read all the posts from the initial OP post. All of it is self-explanatory. Despite what you say, there are a lot of people who get upset about the topic of HDD being legacy. You obviously did not read all the posts. There is an ongoing debate. And this is where the problem comes in at MalwareTips. As soon as you people get upset, then you all do your utmost to shut down the discussion. That is why there are literally thousands of threads here that have been locked. Not to mention so many members banned. This place just isn't a very credible place to discuss much of anything unless a poster is part of the hive agenda and mob rule. HDD discussion is not off-topic. It is relevant to WD performance because WD performs differently on legacy HDD versus current tech SSD. The whole point of the thread is to answer " [SIZE=7][B]Is it true that WD really is lighter and faster than most other AVs?[/B][/SIZE] " That cannot be answered without first identifying whether WD is running on a HDD or SSD. Any discussion not identifying the drive type is highly mis-leading. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top