Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Local Host" data-source="post: 799076">This whole article feels biased towards Linux from the start, the moment it was said Linux has less bugs than Windows I almost spilled my drink laughting.Linux distros tend to have lots of bugs in the most basic levels, just changing the resolution, theme and even installing APPs can give an headache. Just two years ago all the Ubuntu variants didn&#039;t have a working APP Store (which is the most basic funcionally one can have to install APPs).As for Malware, Linux is extremely vulnerable, doesn&#039;t even include a Firewall from the get go. The only thing that makes people believe Linux is more secure than Windows is the fact it&#039;s not heavily targeted. But if Linux was as targeted as Windows it would fall in seconds with no effort.I rarely see people infected with malware nowadays, and there&#039;s lots of suites like Kaspersky which are install and forget.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Local Host, post: 799076"] This whole article feels biased towards Linux from the start, the moment it was said Linux has less bugs than Windows I almost spilled my drink laughting. Linux distros tend to have lots of bugs in the most basic levels, just changing the resolution, theme and even installing APPs can give an headache. Just two years ago all the Ubuntu variants didn't have a working APP Store (which is the most basic funcionally one can have to install APPs). As for Malware, Linux is extremely vulnerable, doesn't even include a Firewall from the get go. The only thing that makes people believe Linux is more secure than Windows is the fact it's not heavily targeted. But if Linux was as targeted as Windows it would fall in seconds with no effort. I rarely see people infected with malware nowadays, and there's lots of suites like Kaspersky which are install and forget. [/QUOTE]

Verification