Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 967968" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Of course, you have the right to have your personal opinion about any AV, but there is no need to seek fanboys among people who disagree with you. Also, your preference of Kaspersky over Defender free with default settings is OK.</p><p></p><p>The methodology similar to adopted in video tests was discussed and criticized many years ago, by people from the AV industry (like Eset, Kaspersky, etc.). This discussion caused the testing Labs to adopt AMTSO methodology. The video demonstration tests are as far from this methodology as Earth from the stars. Such methodology cannot be a source for the comparison of many popular AVs. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p>For example, if a video test uses 1000 samples, then one of the AMTSO requirements is using 1000 VM snapshots - each snapshot for any single sample. I did not see any video-test based on many samples, that could fulfill even 20% of needed AMTSO requirements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 967968, member: 32260"] Of course, you have the right to have your personal opinion about any AV, but there is no need to seek fanboys among people who disagree with you. Also, your preference of Kaspersky over Defender free with default settings is OK. The methodology similar to adopted in video tests was discussed and criticized many years ago, by people from the AV industry (like Eset, Kaspersky, etc.). This discussion caused the testing Labs to adopt AMTSO methodology. The video demonstration tests are as far from this methodology as Earth from the stars. Such methodology cannot be a source for the comparison of many popular AVs. :( For example, if a video test uses 1000 samples, then one of the AMTSO requirements is using 1000 VM snapshots - each snapshot for any single sample. I did not see any video-test based on many samples, that could fulfill even 20% of needed AMTSO requirements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top