Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Local Host" data-source="post: 968096"><p>You wasting your time with personal attacks and poor arguments, the fact this is not the first time and I don't have time nor patience for kids /blocked</p><p></p><p>The test labs are safe environments to advertise Anti-Virus software, it wouldn't surprise that the major Anti-Virus companies would want tests to follow their specifin guidelines, contrary to random videos online showing the raw materials.</p><p></p><p>The AMTSO requirements weren't made by people, but by the AV companies themselves. They should be taken as a grain of salt, and not real world benchmarks.</p><p></p><p>In the real world WD with default settings is still weak in comparison to the competition, and I wouldn't trust it to defend any family member machine.</p><p></p><p>This is not even an Enterprise argument that was brough for no reason, WD with ATP is a far different beast.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Local Host, post: 968096"] You wasting your time with personal attacks and poor arguments, the fact this is not the first time and I don't have time nor patience for kids /blocked The test labs are safe environments to advertise Anti-Virus software, it wouldn't surprise that the major Anti-Virus companies would want tests to follow their specifin guidelines, contrary to random videos online showing the raw materials. The AMTSO requirements weren't made by people, but by the AV companies themselves. They should be taken as a grain of salt, and not real world benchmarks. In the real world WD with default settings is still weak in comparison to the competition, and I wouldn't trust it to defend any family member machine. This is not even an Enterprise argument that was brough for no reason, WD with ATP is a far different beast. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
