Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 968766" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>I think what [USER=36157]@mlnevese[/USER] meant is in default settings or minimal settings changed scenario. Bitdefender is probably the most automated AV out there. Malware, PUP, safe Hacktools, it takes care of everything automatically.</p><p>I understand his points perfectly because I've setup Bitdefender Free + Hard_Configurator (MT profile) on a few of my friends and family members PC. They never complained or had a problem. Paid version is even better with BD central.</p><p>Since BD free is ending, I can't think of any comparable annoyance free, 100% automated free protection for them.</p><p>MD requires user interaction for PUP detection, Kaspersky also needs for those "not-a-virus....." PUPs, Avast has scareware.</p><p></p><p>And to answer OP's question, Microsoft Defender has surely improved protection wise. You can't deny facts, nor you should. It still has quite a few flaws and some are even annoying. </p><p>Most people probably don't need a third party AV, but there are many reasons to go for one. </p><p>Microsoft Defender is good but has room for improvements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 968766, member: 78686"] I think what [USER=36157]@mlnevese[/USER] meant is in default settings or minimal settings changed scenario. Bitdefender is probably the most automated AV out there. Malware, PUP, safe Hacktools, it takes care of everything automatically. I understand his points perfectly because I've setup Bitdefender Free + Hard_Configurator (MT profile) on a few of my friends and family members PC. They never complained or had a problem. Paid version is even better with BD central. Since BD free is ending, I can't think of any comparable annoyance free, 100% automated free protection for them. MD requires user interaction for PUP detection, Kaspersky also needs for those "not-a-virus....." PUPs, Avast has scareware. And to answer OP's question, Microsoft Defender has surely improved protection wise. You can't deny facts, nor you should. It still has quite a few flaws and some are even annoying. Most people probably don't need a third party AV, but there are many reasons to go for one. Microsoft Defender is good but has room for improvements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top