Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 968881"><p>First. what part of "SRP has its limitations" did you not understand? I agreed with you that SRP is not the answer for all malware intrusions, but in combination with other off-the-shelve security mechanisms it helps to reduce the risk of malware to acceptable levels for me. SRP is just one of the players in my security team. When one player in my team has been passed by an opponent, it does nat mean that the opponent scored a goal or won the game. That is the benefit of using multiple levels of security IMO.</p><p></p><p>Secondly: the truth of science has shifted over time when better observations lead to other conclusions (like the earth is flat evolved to earth is round and the evolution theory) and scientific studies leading to ambiguous conclusions (<a href="https://www.voxweb.nl/english/how-one-experiment-can-lead-to-70-different-conclusions" target="_blank">link</a>). So for what I know now, SRP as used in SWH helps to make MD (probably all AV's) stronger. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So its makes sense to disable Microsoft Defender tamper protection to enable DUI's (tamper) protection for Microsoft Defender?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 968881"] First. what part of "SRP has its limitations" did you not understand? I agreed with you that SRP is not the answer for all malware intrusions, but in combination with other off-the-shelve security mechanisms it helps to reduce the risk of malware to acceptable levels for me. SRP is just one of the players in my security team. When one player in my team has been passed by an opponent, it does nat mean that the opponent scored a goal or won the game. That is the benefit of using multiple levels of security IMO. Secondly: the truth of science has shifted over time when better observations lead to other conclusions (like the earth is flat evolved to earth is round and the evolution theory) and scientific studies leading to ambiguous conclusions ([URL='https://www.voxweb.nl/english/how-one-experiment-can-lead-to-70-different-conclusions']link[/URL]). So for what I know now, SRP as used in SWH helps to make MD (probably all AV's) stronger. So its makes sense to disable Microsoft Defender tamper protection to enable DUI's (tamper) protection for Microsoft Defender? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top