Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
Is the improved performance of Microsoft Defender a myth? Should we necessarily be using a 3rd party AV?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 968966" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I am irritated when people try to incorrectly interpret my posts. So, if I state something clearly several times and next I see the post that clearly suggests that I stated the opposite, I am irritated.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>Of course, I would like when the (classic) SRP could run in Ring 0, but this would not improve much its protection for home users. Simply, the attackers do not even try to dismantle it, because it is so rarely used at home. I did not see any anti-SRP modules in any exploit kit. Furthermore, I did not see any malware in the wild (in the last few years) which would try to dismantle SRP.</p><p>So, I will worry only when half of the home users will start using SRP (which will never happen). <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 968966, member: 32260"] I am irritated when people try to incorrectly interpret my posts. So, if I state something clearly several times and next I see the post that clearly suggests that I stated the opposite, I am irritated.:) Of course, I would like when the (classic) SRP could run in Ring 0, but this would not improve much its protection for home users. Simply, the attackers do not even try to dismantle it, because it is so rarely used at home. I did not see any anti-SRP modules in any exploit kit. Furthermore, I did not see any malware in the wild (in the last few years) which would try to dismantle SRP. So, I will worry only when half of the home users will start using SRP (which will never happen). :)(y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top