Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Is the term "Traditional Antvirus" heavily misused?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ScandinavianFish" data-source="post: 977814" data-attributes="member: 93786"><p>Its been on my mind for a very long time, all I see with "Next Gen" companies ans their marketing tactics is them basically just saying "Traditional AV bad, they just rely on signatures and cant detect zero days, but we are good because we use AI", but doesnt like every single AV employ some sort of AI and/or ML for malware detection? Not to mentoom various other techniques to detect both known and unknown threats, such as as heuristic, behavior analysis, sandboxes, etc.</p><p></p><p>Windows Defender, for example, uses 7 different types of machine learning models for detection of fileless and zero day malware.</p><p></p><p>Am I not getting something about the whole "Traditional" part or are they just completely oblivious to reality?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ScandinavianFish, post: 977814, member: 93786"] Its been on my mind for a very long time, all I see with "Next Gen" companies ans their marketing tactics is them basically just saying "Traditional AV bad, they just rely on signatures and cant detect zero days, but we are good because we use AI", but doesnt like every single AV employ some sort of AI and/or ML for malware detection? Not to mentoom various other techniques to detect both known and unknown threats, such as as heuristic, behavior analysis, sandboxes, etc. Windows Defender, for example, uses 7 different types of machine learning models for detection of fileless and zero day malware. Am I not getting something about the whole "Traditional" part or are they just completely oblivious to reality? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top