Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Is there a consensus on which AV has the lowest performance impact?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 793711" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>I might perform a test for it when it is official released</p><p>btw, sophos products are not appealing to me because they always lack something I want, like self-protection (RWs encrypted SHP files => permanently malfunctioned), weak ransomware protection (SHP), very poor heuristics and signatures for zero-day malwares (always detected 20-40% of the malwares from MT hub packs, mostly 20-30%), and BB is below average according my test some months ago</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 793711, member: 51905"] I might perform a test for it when it is official released btw, sophos products are not appealing to me because they always lack something I want, like self-protection (RWs encrypted SHP files => permanently malfunctioned), weak ransomware protection (SHP), very poor heuristics and signatures for zero-day malwares (always detected 20-40% of the malwares from MT hub packs, mostly 20-30%), and BB is below average according my test some months ago [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
