Windows_Security
Level 24
Thread author
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
- Mar 13, 2016
- 1,298
To be honest this setup is inspired by two consecutive posts of @ozone and @EASTER in this overview thread of free anti-ransomware programs
First Ozone mentioned that the developer of EasyFileLocker was the same as Shadow Defender. Secondly Easter posted that he still liked SecureFolders, a program simular to EasyFileLocker. From the other security forum I remembered Easter to be a hard core Shadow Defender user, so why did not he use a simular program from the same developer (since SecureFolders is abandonware). Since those programs (Shadow Defender and Secure Folders) both filter disk access, there is always an incompatibility risk. But I also know that Easter likes to cover every dispatch in the System Service Descriptor Table twice. So when someone has experience in finding compatible pairs of protection programs it is Easter.
An insight or idea popped up*. Obviously disk protection programs from different vendors work together well. When you think about a disk protection program like EasyFileLocker, it protects the DATA on C:\Users and other Data partitions depending on the setup, while a disk virtualisation program like Shadow Defender typically would protect the OS and your installed programs, so it makes sense that they would not interfere with each other.
So would a freebie like ToolWizTimeFreeze (simular to Shadow Defender) play along well with another freebie EasyFileLocker (simular to SecureFolders)?: To start with the spoiler: YES at least at my wife's laptop running Windows 7 ultimate 32 bits. Next posts: short explanation and screenprints of first EasyFileLocker and secondly ToolwizTimeFreeze.
*) I am that old (Kees1958 was my first nickname) that I had to learn to write with my right hand at elementary school while being a lefty (teachers in those days were allowed to slap you on your left hand with a reed when I tried to write left). Using your creative brain part for rational stuff makes your brain take other short cuts (good for creativity by making other associations, bad for grammar because it causes dyslectic like side effects).
First Ozone mentioned that the developer of EasyFileLocker was the same as Shadow Defender. Secondly Easter posted that he still liked SecureFolders, a program simular to EasyFileLocker. From the other security forum I remembered Easter to be a hard core Shadow Defender user, so why did not he use a simular program from the same developer (since SecureFolders is abandonware). Since those programs (Shadow Defender and Secure Folders) both filter disk access, there is always an incompatibility risk. But I also know that Easter likes to cover every dispatch in the System Service Descriptor Table twice. So when someone has experience in finding compatible pairs of protection programs it is Easter.
An insight or idea popped up*. Obviously disk protection programs from different vendors work together well. When you think about a disk protection program like EasyFileLocker, it protects the DATA on C:\Users and other Data partitions depending on the setup, while a disk virtualisation program like Shadow Defender typically would protect the OS and your installed programs, so it makes sense that they would not interfere with each other.
So would a freebie like ToolWizTimeFreeze (simular to Shadow Defender) play along well with another freebie EasyFileLocker (simular to SecureFolders)?: To start with the spoiler: YES at least at my wife's laptop running Windows 7 ultimate 32 bits. Next posts: short explanation and screenprints of first EasyFileLocker and secondly ToolwizTimeFreeze.
*) I am that old (Kees1958 was my first nickname) that I had to learn to write with my right hand at elementary school while being a lefty (teachers in those days were allowed to slap you on your left hand with a reed when I tried to write left). Using your creative brain part for rational stuff makes your brain take other short cuts (good for creativity by making other associations, bad for grammar because it causes dyslectic like side effects).
Last edited: