Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1043547">Link: <a href="https://brave.com/privacy-updates/4-fingerprinting-defenses-2.0/#1-past-and-current-generation-fingerprinting-protections" target="_blank">Fingerprinting defenses 2.0 | Brave Browser</a>[SPOILER=&quot;Farbling explained by Brave&quot;][ATTACH=full]275988[/ATTACH][/SPOILER]I remember a discussion with Kees1958 and the lead developer (and project leader) of JShelter over here and on Github, where Kees1958 even posted not to use JShelter because it randomized values outside the &#039;&quot;real world range&quot;.&nbsp; Later on the lead developer made a 180 and added an issue himself to randomize using a real world set or scope range. JShelter calls this little lies. The developers seem to be influenced by Brave a lot. I have not seen Kees1958 reconciling with JShelter.From what I read and understand JShelter now seems to be the only free extension developing anti-fingerprininting which really works. I am using it on-demand (right click allow access to a website in Edge) using Chromium browsers option to use an extension on specific websites only. I also use a setting which is more focussed on little lies than protection (but still seems to work well, as posted in this thread: <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/jshelter-javascript-restrictor.110289/page-5#post-1042203" target="_blank">link to more farbling oriented settings</a>)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1043547"] Link: [URL='https://brave.com/privacy-updates/4-fingerprinting-defenses-2.0/#1-past-and-current-generation-fingerprinting-protections']Fingerprinting defenses 2.0 | Brave Browser[/URL] [SPOILER="Farbling explained by Brave"] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1686201680768.png"]275988[/ATTACH] [/SPOILER] I remember a discussion with Kees1958 and the lead developer (and project leader) of JShelter over here and on Github, where Kees1958 even posted not to use JShelter because it randomized values outside the '"real world range". Later on the lead developer made a 180 and added an issue himself to randomize using a real world set or scope range. JShelter calls this little lies. The developers seem to be influenced by Brave a lot. I have not seen Kees1958 reconciling with JShelter. From what I read and understand JShelter now seems to be the only free extension developing anti-fingerprininting which really works. I am using it on-demand (right click allow access to a website in Edge) using Chromium browsers option to use an extension on specific websites only. I also use a setting which is more focussed on little lies than protection (but still seems to work well, as posted in this thread: [URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/jshelter-javascript-restrictor.110289/page-5#post-1042203']link to more farbling oriented settings[/URL]) [/QUOTE]

Verification