Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Kaspersky
Kaspersky browser extension versus KIS web-protection
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dabluez98" data-source="post: 961632" data-attributes="member: 75357"><p>@[USER=88686]SpiderWeb[/USER] I agree with you in spirit and regarding the security issues. But also, my own thoughts were similar to what @[USER=93099]ExecutiveOrder[/USER] confirmed - that this was a case of geopolitics, and if I am involved inn anyway in it - then for sure it would be dumb NOT to turn off KSN. </p><p></p><p>But there is still a point that at the end of the day a man-in-the-middle certificate is not optimal for privacy and security, as you suggest so I will keep this mind. However, this does also bring under question then the whole thing about cloud-based securities, and I would love to see a test comparing effectiveness without KSN and with KSN, even if at the end of the day a middle-man-certificate does not make sense.</p><p></p><p>I Wonder if it is about what [USER=93099]@ExecutiveOrder[/USER] said, it helps to protect you by also preventing that malware from landing on your territory even if once it lands remedial measures are still possible, but in case they fail. And @[USER=88686]SpiderWeb[/USER] you mentioned " Kaspersky will block https without encrypted scanning", but doesn't KSN also help with files on the computer, etc?</p><p></p><p>I also have more heaps to go through before completely learning what either of you have eventually said, so please take everything I have said based on what you said with a grain of salt. Thanks [USER=93099]@ExecutiveOrder[/USER] and [USER=88686]@SpiderWeb[/USER] for helping me learn.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dabluez98, post: 961632, member: 75357"] @[USER=88686]SpiderWeb[/USER] I agree with you in spirit and regarding the security issues. But also, my own thoughts were similar to what @[USER=93099]ExecutiveOrder[/USER] confirmed - that this was a case of geopolitics, and if I am involved inn anyway in it - then for sure it would be dumb NOT to turn off KSN. But there is still a point that at the end of the day a man-in-the-middle certificate is not optimal for privacy and security, as you suggest so I will keep this mind. However, this does also bring under question then the whole thing about cloud-based securities, and I would love to see a test comparing effectiveness without KSN and with KSN, even if at the end of the day a middle-man-certificate does not make sense. I Wonder if it is about what [USER=93099]@ExecutiveOrder[/USER] said, it helps to protect you by also preventing that malware from landing on your territory even if once it lands remedial measures are still possible, but in case they fail. And @[USER=88686]SpiderWeb[/USER] you mentioned " Kaspersky will block https without encrypted scanning", but doesn't KSN also help with files on the computer, etc? I also have more heaps to go through before completely learning what either of you have eventually said, so please take everything I have said based on what you said with a grain of salt. Thanks [USER=93099]@ExecutiveOrder[/USER] and [USER=88686]@SpiderWeb[/USER] for helping me learn. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top