Kaspersky did good, but i wouldn't feel safe seeing that much suspicious processes running, if some of that was undetected ransomware kaspersky would have failed. Thanks for review!
Kaspersky did good, but i wouldn't feel safe seeing that much suspicious processes running, if some of that was undetected ransomware kaspersky would have failed. Thanks for review!
Kaspersky in Home & Corporate products still has to work improving detection of PUP/PUA/Adware... some of the missed samples because They just didn't add them or are considered legal
KES did pretty good.
Ondemand scanners found PUP only.
As harlan mentioned "Kaspersky in Home & Corporate products still has to work improving detection of PUP/PUA/Adware... some of the missed samples because They just didn't add them or are considered legal ".
Kaspersky and to a great extent Norton,and others, don't consider adware etc as malicious per-se,nevertheless,they should up their game concerning such items!
They fear being sued I believe!!?
Kaspersky in Home & Corporate products still has to work improving detection of PUP/PUA/Adware... some of the missed samples because They just didn't add them or are considered legal
KES did pretty good.
Ondemand scanners found PUP only.
As harlan mentioned "Kaspersky in Home & Corporate products still has to work improving detection of PUP/PUA/Adware... some of the missed samples because They just didn't add them or are considered legal ".
Kaspersky and to a great extent Norton,and others, don't consider adware etc as malicious per-se,nevertheless,they should up their game concerning such items!
They fear being sued I believe!!?