Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1115218" data-attributes="member: 57714">You can technically configure Symantec to be very privacy respecting at the cost of no reputation based detectionSo if you&#039;re some criminal probably Symantec is a better choice with configuration or If you care about privacyBut specifically zeroday I think Symantec because of how much aggressive sonar , bloodhound is and that every downloaded executable is checked for reputationOf course it has the most false positives of the three but should be better assuming the vector of entry is the webBut if you&#039;re just opening a random zip with tons of payloads without mark of web like done by testers just like Leo(the PC security channel)Then I think Kaspersky , bitdefender will catch more samples with Symantec slightly below most of the timeAnyway really depends but real world I think all the layers of Symantec will protect a machine better but they all will fail against some malwareOh and specifically blocking ransomware between the 3 Kaspersky will be bestSo basically they can all fail and some will do better against certain threats , vectors of entry</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1115218, member: 57714"] You can technically configure Symantec to be very privacy respecting at the cost of no reputation based detection So if you're some criminal probably Symantec is a better choice with configuration or If you care about privacy But specifically zeroday I think Symantec because of how much aggressive sonar , bloodhound is and that every downloaded executable is checked for reputation Of course it has the most false positives of the three but should be better assuming the vector of entry is the web But if you're just opening a random zip with tons of payloads without mark of web like done by testers just like Leo(the PC security channel) Then I think Kaspersky , bitdefender will catch more samples with Symantec slightly below most of the time Anyway really depends but real world I think all the layers of Symantec will protect a machine better but they all will fail against some malware Oh and specifically blocking ransomware between the 3 Kaspersky will be best So basically they can all fail and some will do better against certain threats , vectors of entry [/QUOTE]

Verification