Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Kaspersky
Kaspersky Security Network "KSN"
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zorro" data-source="post: 848943" data-attributes="member: 80312"><p>Compared with other antiviruses, it’s not to say that Kaspersky Anti-Virus is particularly different. <a href="https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/avc_datasending_2014_en.pdf" target="_blank">Read</a> Other antiviruses merge no less than Kaspersky. In addition, it is not clear why this should worry an ordinary citizen who is far from political games. Even if we assume that the antivirus downloads some user files so that they are checked by the FSB agents, then given the number of users who have the antivirus installed, it will be such a volume of files that the FSB simply does not have enough human resources to analyze all this))) Yes , we can say that all information can be filtered by artificial intelligence (by keywords, for example), but then this artificial intelligence will simply drop / delete those user files that it does not detect suspicion, and thus The privacy of the ordinary user will not be affected (only the most suspicious files will go to the manual analysis of the content). But this is only a suspicion, an assumption without evidence. As they say in Russia: “Not caught - not a thief”, irrefutable evidence is always needed, and if there is none, then the presumption of innocence is valid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zorro, post: 848943, member: 80312"] Compared with other antiviruses, it’s not to say that Kaspersky Anti-Virus is particularly different. [URL='https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/avc_datasending_2014_en.pdf']Read[/URL] Other antiviruses merge no less than Kaspersky. In addition, it is not clear why this should worry an ordinary citizen who is far from political games. Even if we assume that the antivirus downloads some user files so that they are checked by the FSB agents, then given the number of users who have the antivirus installed, it will be such a volume of files that the FSB simply does not have enough human resources to analyze all this))) Yes , we can say that all information can be filtered by artificial intelligence (by keywords, for example), but then this artificial intelligence will simply drop / delete those user files that it does not detect suspicion, and thus The privacy of the ordinary user will not be affected (only the most suspicious files will go to the manual analysis of the content). But this is only a suspicion, an assumption without evidence. As they say in Russia: “Not caught - not a thief”, irrefutable evidence is always needed, and if there is none, then the presumption of innocence is valid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top