Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 820075" data-attributes="member: 32260">TAM can also handle the most dangerous file types blocked by SRP:.bat, .cmd, .com, .exe, .js, .jse, .msc, .msi, .msp, .pif, .ps1, .reg, .scr, settingcontent-ms, .vbe, .vbs, .wsf, .wsh, (maybe also .dll and some more). Yet, it does not support a few dangerous file types, like: .chm, .hta, .lnk .So, in the home environment with Windows 10, Kaspersky with activated TAM is probably very similar in preventing malware infections as WD + H_C. The second solution can be slightly more restrictive for programs initiated with standard rights. But, in the enterprises, the first has an advantage over the second when the attack comes from the local network with administrator privileges. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 820075, member: 32260"] TAM can also handle the most dangerous file types blocked by SRP: .bat, .cmd, .com, .exe, .js, .jse, .msc, .msi, .msp, .pif, .ps1, .reg, .scr, settingcontent-ms, .vbe, .vbs, .wsf, .wsh, (maybe also .dll and some more). Yet, it does not support a few dangerous file types, like: .chm, .hta, .lnk . So, in the home environment with Windows 10,[COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B] Kaspersky with activated TAM [/B][/COLOR]is probably very similar in preventing malware infections as[COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)][B] WD +[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)][B]H_C[/B][/COLOR]. The [COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)][B]second solution[/B][/COLOR] can be slightly more restrictive for programs initiated with standard rights. But, in the enterprises, the [COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]first [/B][/COLOR]has an advantage over the [COLOR=rgb(41, 105, 176)][B]second[/B][/COLOR] when the attack comes from the local network with administrator privileges. (y) [/QUOTE]

Verification