Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pilot777" data-source="post: 985859" data-attributes="member: 94948"><p>Yes, this is exacttly what I meant... After running some tests since 21.5 became semi-offically available, I haven&#039;t seen any evidence that their actual anti-malware capability improved. So, like You said, I&#039;ve tested directly and have found no difference, other than the interface changes. Makes me wonder, if this is because the dev teams are simply forced by their marketing crowd to keep making someting seemingly new each year, purely for the markerting purposes. I mean, just think about it... Does the cyber-threats landscape magically evolve onto the next stage every time it&#039;s December 31st? &#039;Course not... So, why do security software vendors keep churning out some &quot;super-new&quot; versions every year? IMHO, it&#039;s because they&#039;re pushed by their (evil) marketing crowd, which more often than not, tends to cause things to become more ridiculous (and also less efficient) from the purely technological standpoint.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Pilot777, post: 985859, member: 94948"] Yes, this is exacttly what I meant... After running some tests since 21.5 became semi-offically available, I haven't seen any evidence that their actual anti-malware capability improved. So, like You said, I've tested directly and have found no difference, other than the interface changes. Makes me wonder, if this is because the dev teams are simply forced by their marketing crowd to keep making someting seemingly new each year, purely for the markerting purposes. I mean, just think about it... Does the cyber-threats landscape magically evolve onto the next stage every time it's December 31st? 'Course not... So, why do security software vendors keep churning out some "super-new" versions every year? IMHO, it's because they're pushed by their (evil) marketing crowd, which more often than not, tends to cause things to become more ridiculous (and also less efficient) from the purely technological standpoint. [/QUOTE]

Verification