Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Kaspersky vs Bitdefender Test vs 2000 Malware (TPSC)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roger_m" data-source="post: 1074300" data-attributes="member: 31436"><p>As usual, hundreds of samples are being launched one after the other, which is not something that is going to happen in the real world, so it's not a very good way to test the protection abilities. Also, as already mentioned, the computer was rebooted without letting Kaspersky disinfect and restart it, which is ridiculous. Aside from that. It's not a very good test when it includes harmless PUPs alongside malware. If PUPs are allowed to run and are not quarantined, it really doesn't matter as they are not malicious. Quite often antiviruses don't do very well at detecting PUPs, because they aren't malicious. I would have no issue if a separate test of just PUPs was done and no doubt, some people would find such a test useful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roger_m, post: 1074300, member: 31436"] As usual, hundreds of samples are being launched one after the other, which is not something that is going to happen in the real world, so it's not a very good way to test the protection abilities. Also, as already mentioned, the computer was rebooted without letting Kaspersky disinfect and restart it, which is ridiculous. Aside from that. It's not a very good test when it includes harmless PUPs alongside malware. If PUPs are allowed to run and are not quarantined, it really doesn't matter as they are not malicious. Quite often antiviruses don't do very well at detecting PUPs, because they aren't malicious. I would have no issue if a separate test of just PUPs was done and no doubt, some people would find such a test useful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
