Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 1068153" data-attributes="member: 78686">Don&#039;t have ESET on my VM at the moment so unable to verify by myself. You may follow this guide. In the guide below it shows the method of putting addresses into &quot;List of addresses excluded from content scan&quot;. Instead you put your sites in the &quot;List of allowed address&quot; section and see if it does what you&#039;re looking for.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://support.eset.com/en/kb2960-exclude-a-safe-website-from-being-blocked-by-web-access-protection[/URL]No, this is not related to more sophisticated technologies. Different engine, different technology, different filtering driver, different optimization many things can contribute to this. We can not know for sure. But in simple term, ESET&#039;s HTTPS scanning is more optimized for their product. Avast in my experience is the fastest at HTTPS scanning, then ESET then Kaspersky.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 1068153, member: 78686"] Don't have ESET on my VM at the moment so unable to verify by myself. You may follow this guide. In the guide below it shows the method of putting addresses into "List of addresses excluded from content scan". Instead you put your sites in the "List of allowed address" section and see if it does what you're looking for. [URL unfurl="true"]https://support.eset.com/en/kb2960-exclude-a-safe-website-from-being-blocked-by-web-access-protection[/URL] No, this is not related to more sophisticated technologies. Different engine, different technology, different filtering driver, different optimization many things can contribute to this. We can not know for sure. But in simple term, ESET's HTTPS scanning is more optimized for their product. Avast in my experience is the fastest at HTTPS scanning, then ESET then Kaspersky. [/QUOTE]

Verification