Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 944538" data-attributes="member: 32260">It would be interesting to test this combo on MH. If on EXE files Cylance could be as effective as Defender (HIGH settings), then SWH + Cylance would be a nice combo. Some incomplete tests (rather presentations than tests) can suggest that on malicious EXE files Defender on HIGH settings can be more effective than Cylance.[MEDIA=youtube]N4Vex7l8jv4[/MEDIA][MEDIA=youtube]eGsfX43FWjQ[/MEDIA]Of course, the results of the &quot;tests&quot; on the PC Security Channel are only unverified suggestions.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" />Anyway, any AV (also slightly tweaked) which is as effective as Defender (HIGH settings) is worth attention.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 944538, member: 32260"] It would be interesting to test this combo on MH. If on EXE files Cylance could be as effective as Defender (HIGH settings), then SWH + Cylance would be a nice combo. Some incomplete tests (rather presentations than tests) can suggest that on malicious EXE files Defender on HIGH settings can be more effective than Cylance. [MEDIA=youtube]N4Vex7l8jv4[/MEDIA] [MEDIA=youtube]eGsfX43FWjQ[/MEDIA] Of course, the results of the "tests" on the PC Security Channel are only unverified suggestions.:unsure: Anyway, any AV (also slightly tweaked) which is as effective as Defender (HIGH settings) is worth attention.:) [/QUOTE]

Verification