Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Machine Learning for Malware Detection (KasperskyLab)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1116041" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>In the context of FUDs, the first chart is interesting:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]287281[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>It suggests, that the protection rate against a few hours old malware can be around 70%. According to known malware statistics, there can be 20% of 0-day-old malware. Probably 1/3 of them (7%) can be a few hours old. The infection rate of those malware samples is practically untested in the Real-World tests (AV-Test, AV-Comparatives, SE Labs, etc.) because collecting/selecting the malware samples can usually take several hours, and after that delay, most of those samples are already known to the tested AVs.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>I suspect that in Real-World tests the tiny differences in the AVs protection can be much smaller than mainly undetected differences related to a few hours old malware.</strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1116041, member: 32260"] In the context of FUDs, the first chart is interesting: [ATTACH type="full" width="366px" alt="1737800449967.png"]287281[/ATTACH] It suggests, that the protection rate against a few hours old malware can be around 70%. According to known malware statistics, there can be 20% of 0-day-old malware. Probably 1/3 of them (7%) can be a few hours old. The infection rate of those malware samples is practically untested in the Real-World tests (AV-Test, AV-Comparatives, SE Labs, etc.) because collecting/selecting the malware samples can usually take several hours, and after that delay, most of those samples are already known to the tested AVs. [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]I suspect that in Real-World tests the tiny differences in the AVs protection can be much smaller than mainly undetected differences related to a few hours old malware.[/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
